“Ancient Armageddon”: How SEO Is Assisting Archaeologists Debunk Conspiracy Theories

Posted by

The viewpoints revealed within this story are solely the author’s and do not reflect the opinions and beliefs of Online search engine Journal or its affiliates.

You may have heard about “Ancient Armageddon”, a series in which host Graham Hancock proposes controversial theories about the origins of ancient civilizations.

It invested a week trending in the international leading 10 on Netflix, accruing around 24,620,000 watch hours in between November 14th and November 20th, 2022.

Netflix lends authority to the program by categorizing it as a “docuseries,” and IMDB categorizes it as a “documentary” and “history.”

However online, it’s been shrouded in debate, and search algorithms may be satisfying good-faith critiques about the program from researchers and educators– as some working archeologists have considered the program unsubstantiated pseudoscience at finest, and unsafe false information at worst.

The Society For American Archaeology wrote a letter to Netflix asking it to reclassify and contextualize the program, pointing out the host’s “aggressive rhetoric,” the program’s “incorrect claims,” and the associations that the theories presented have with “racist, white supremacist ideologies.”

But this is a story about the function SEO plays in the controversy– how researchers and science communicators provide their critiques of the show, and how audiences discover them.

Browse algorithms get a lot of reviews for how they can be utilized to spread false information.

But in this case, I have actually seen support for educators and scientists who have actually committed to pushing back on popular pseudoscience.

Creators Rebutting “Ancient Apocalypse” Get A Boost From SEO

I first discovered of the debate from Buy YouTube Subscribers creator “History With Kayleigh,” who, while not an academic or recognized archaeologist, develops educational videos about ancient history and historical sites.

She connected with Tweets from scientists who had actually reacted and “decided to attempt and compose a reasonable defense to the show,” as she informed me.

Kayleigh’s video about “Ancient Apocalypse” isn’t the best-performing video on her channel. Still, it was absolutely performing above the average of her current releases in a short amount of time, at 67,000 views on December 1st.

Screenshot from Buy YouTube Subscribers, December

2022 But then, I took another screenshot of the channel after the weekend, on December 5th

. Kayleigh launched a 2nd video, and the first” Ancient Apocalypse: Fact Or Fiction?” had already grown to 104,000 views

. Screenshot from Buy YouTube Subscribers, December 2022 Kayleigh wasn’t the only creator to release content about the Netflix series. Dr. Costs Farley, an archaeologist and associate teacher at Southern Connecticut State University who runs a

little Buy YouTube Subscribers channel about archaeology in his leisure time, made one of the earliest Buy YouTube Subscribers videos critiquing Hancock and the show. And while his reach is much smaller, his videos about”Ancient Armageddon” exploded. Screenshot from Buy YouTube Subscribers, December 2022 Screenshot from Buy YouTube Subscribers, December 2022 Dr. Farley shared screenshots of his Buy YouTube Subscribers analytics, showing that

his first video about Graham Hancock drew more traffic than typical from Google searches. The below screenshots are from November 22nd, when

the video was still around 5,000 views. For that particular video, the” external”traffic source was around 28 %, compared to his channel average of around 10%. A 3rd of that external traffic was from Google.

Screenshot of internal analytics of the”Archeology Tube” Buy YouTube Subscribers channel, November 2022< img src= "https://cdn.searchenginejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/unnamed-639a5869b100b-sej.png"alt=" A screenshot of YouTube channel"Archaeology Tube"internal analytics"/ > Screenshot of internal analytics of the “Archeology Tube” Buy YouTube Subscribers channel, November 2022

The following screenshot is the overall channel data for contrast. Screenshot of internal analytics of the “Archeology Tube” Buy YouTube Subscribers channel, November

2022 He likewise shared the search terms the video was carrying out best for within Buy YouTube Subscribers search. Screenshot of internal analytics of the “Archeology Tube” Buy YouTube Subscribers channel, November 2022 I signed in again with his channel on December 5th. Screenshot from Buy YouTube Subscribers, December 2022 This very first video still gains most of its

traffic from search terms. External views on it were about 11% lower on December 5th than they were on November 22nd. This makes good sense with publications picking up the story

and filling online search engine results pages(SERPs ). Screenshot of internal analytics of the”Archeology Tube”Buy YouTube Subscribers channel, November 2022 The 2nd video has wildly various stats, being pressed mainly by Buy YouTube Subscribers’s browse features like advised videos. Screenshot of internal analytics of the “Archeology Tube” Buy YouTube Subscribers channel, November 2022

This time, Buy YouTube Subscribers seems to have recognized the interest in a trending subject and pushed the video accordingly. In the very first video that he made about”Ancient Archaeology, “Dr. Farley addressed Hancock straight with a review concentrating on the relationship between the theories postured in the program, and white supremacy.

In the second video, Dr. Farley concentrated on debunking the particular frauds in the show.

He informed me, “There is a MARKED difference in the reactions to the two videos. In video # 1, I mention white supremacy and the history of Atlantean misconceptions with racism. That video has … hundreds of disparaging remarks [that] are misogynistic, racist, and homophobic.

The 2nd video likewise has some comments like this, however much more positive comments or useful criticisms. This video just spoke directly to a few of the fallacies in the program but does not directly resolve bigotry or white supremacy.”

Even with the negative response, the truth stays that people seen and engaged with the video, as this screenshot of the video’s engagement stats shows.

Screenshot of internal analytics of the”Archeology Tube”Buy YouTube Subscribers channel, November 2022 One could argue that this is a fluke– and that these seemingly effective performance metrics are merely about profiting from a trending keyword.

However Buy YouTube Subscribers algorithms work in a different way from Google Search.

Buy YouTube Subscribers utilizes metadata about videos to estimate significance, but it also uses user engagement signals such as watch time to evaluate the relevance of videos to particular queries. Buy YouTube Subscribers’s leading ranking aspect is audience fulfillment.

“History with Kayleigh” has a large following already that likely offered her videos an increase. However Dr. Farley does not have a big following, and the reach of his videos boils down to natural discovery.

People Search For Information About “Ancient Apocalypse” And Discover Review

Other researchers, with small and large followings, have actually likewise seen unusually high traffic about this topic on other platforms.

Dr. Flint Dibble, an archaeologist at Cardiff University, composed a counterclaim for The Discussion and noted the popularity of the piece on Buy Twitter Verification:

Screenshot from Buy Twitter Verification, November 2022

I reached out to Dr. Dibble for his viewpoint. He stated: “I’ve gotten a wide range of actions to my thread. Plenty of abuse, and plenty of appreciation. Numerous people plainly discovered it while searching for more info on the program.

Some, specifically within the first week of release, discussed they were searching Buy Twitter Verification to find responses to it either before enjoying or mid-watch.

Individuals who mentioned finding the thread through a search were all pleased for rapidly getting a clearer context for the show.”

He shared an example of a Buy Twitter Verification user who went looking for details about the program while they were watching it and appreciated the review he published on the platform:

Screenshot from Buy Twitter Verification, December 2022

Dr. Andre Costopoulos, an archaeologist at the University Of Alberta, discussed the program on his individual WordPress blog site and shared his blog analytics with me in late November.

The content he blogged about “Ancient Armageddon” became the best performing on his website in a matter of days, with Google Search comprising the clear majority of traffic.

Screenshot of internal analytics from archeothoughts.wordpress.com, November 2022

Overall, this isn’t a substantial quantity of traffic. What’s fascinating here is how the material about the program compares to other material by this creator, particularly since the site is relatively small.

Dr. Costopoulos thinks that scientists can reach audiences hungry for info if they learn the tools.

“Scientists can utilize these tools simply as well as our pseudo-alters,” he informed me, “and typically to better effect, due to the fact that we really have evidence to back up our claims.”

How SEO Can Be Used To Spread Out False Information

Search algorithms are hotbeds of misinformation.

Dissemination of conspiracies and misinformation has actually been a hot topic on various platforms, from Buy YouTube Subscribers to Buy Facebook Verification.

Google has been considering false information and how best to resolve it for several years.

People who pitch conspiracy theories and pseudoscience understand this. They’re skilled online marketers and writers, and they’re good at SEO.

That can make it far more difficult to communicate excellent science than false information. Scientists have demanding tasks beyond marketing and publishing, and their conclusions are frequently tough to interact successfully.

They’re not trained to do it, and academia is sluggish to adjust to digital trends.

That leads the way for a conspiracy theory to take off with little more than a good story and excellent marketing.

Dr. Farley stated: “By and big, I think academics have no idea how to do SEO (I’m simply stumbling around in the dark myself), and misinformation folks are much, better at it. Academics, honestly, don’t have the time to learn this stuff.

It would be truly cool if our universities would help … however I’ve discovered the media departments at unis are very old school. If I brought this to them, they ‘d pitch a media declaration to the local newspaper.

Our media department is terrific and has great objectives, but by and large, they’re early in the game on using social networks as a media tool.”

So we have a dilemma where researchers, who aren’t always trained in interactions and marketing, take on against expert online marketers of ideas. And they’re doing it with personal passion projects on top of their existing jobs.

When it pertains to organic reach, researchers need allies.

Is Critique Of “Ancient Armageddon” Having An Impact?

The results don’t appear as encouraging when you zoom out and have a look at the SERPs for “Ancient Armageddon.”

I opened an incognito window in Chrome and ensured my VPN was turned on (United States location), then looked for [ancient armageddon]

The results here are a little a mixed bag. The very first result is just a link to the show. That’s to be expected.

Immediately below are the video results. The 2nd video result appears to support the show. It had around 60,000 views when I took the screenshot. That’s a substantial amount of reach compared to the examples we took a look at above.

The third video result has much fewer views but critiques the program.

We can likewise see, on the details panel, that the reviews from the scientific community may not be having a prevalent impact. Audiences examine the program well.

Beneath the video results, we do see critiques from The Guardian and Slate. Let’s flip over to the news outcomes.

These are mainly reviews of the show published on large media platforms. Reporters are assisting researchers get their message out.

I checked in once again a few days later on, utilizing an incognito guest Chrome web browser with my VPN turned on (United States location). There was a fascinating modification in the SERP:

It appears like Google detected the debate and the newsworthiness of the search. The video results were gone, replaced by a “Top Stories” search feature that appears above the natural results.

So, what’s the takeaway here?

Archaeologists Saw A Boost From SEO With Limited, But Important, Effect

Archaeologists did see an increase from SEO on this subject. But we can see from Google results that the program is popular, and the program’s supporters have a lot of traction too.

The restricted effect of this cumulative effort shows the obstacles facing science communicators. The impact of their review seems to be a drop in the bucket compared to millions of individuals who viewed the program.

But we should not mark down the success of these researchers and educators, either.

They’re building neighborhoods, providing information for individuals who look for it, and altering minds. When you look closely, you can clearly search algorithms rewarding these developers for their efforts.

Interested users do find legitimate clinical research study when they check out the series. The content is reaching individuals, and it’s inspiring them to take a look at the show seriously.

This is motivating news for the general quality of search.

I believe online marketers can help here.

SEO specialists have the knowledge and resources to help amplify these messages. Perhaps we could consider it a little bit of search community service.

More resources:

Included Image: Elnur/SMM Panel